![]() Interested reader may want to read our report on how the 4 largest airlines use AI, but we’ll begin our exploration of facial recognition at airports with the companies offering passenger processing applications, starting with Aurora Computer Services: Passenger Processing Aurora Computer ServicesĪurora Computer Services offers Aurora Imaging & Recognition (AIR) engine, which it claims can help validate a person’s identity quickly and efficiently using biometrics and facial recognition technology.Īurora Computer Services can integrate the software into a client’s passenger scanning system as a software development kit (SDK), if any, or bundle it with its Aether sensor unit. Their software seems to be installed at self-service kiosks and integrated with security cameras laden throughout an airport. ![]() Kairos and Yitu Technology both market their facial recognition software for security purposes.Their software could be installed at self-service kiosks and turnstiles at airports. Auroroa Computer Services, SenseTime, and Société Internationale de Télécommunications Aéronautiques (SITA), all market their facial recognition software for passenger processing purposes.These companies are detailed below with the software they offer: It’s rare for a facial recognition company to cater to only one industry. That said, all of these companies offer facial recognition software to a variety of industries. Thus, in this report, we’ll detail five companies offering facial recognition technology for a variety of use cases, including airport security and passenger processing. We had intended to write an article about the broader use of AI in the commercial aviation industry, but no other application has more traction in the industry than facial recognition. Their promise: to increase security and potentially speed up passenger boarding. In a statement, the ICO said, “It is important to note that this judgment does not remove the ICO’s ability to act against companies based internationally who process data of people in the U.K., particularly businesses scraping data of people in the U.K., and instead covers a specific exemption around foreign law enforcement.Although AI has broader applications in the travel and tourism industry, facial recognition kiosks at airports have been one of the most prominent applications in the public discussion about AI. GDPR) provides that acts of foreign governments fall outside its scope it is not for one government to seek to bind or control the activities of another sovereign state,” a lawyer explained to the BBC. It’s believed this may not bode well for the other countries currently taking action against the company. This week, a British appeals court ruled that the ICO does “not have jurisdiction” over how foreign law enforcement or national security bodies use British citizens’ data. France, Italy and Greece have each issued fines of $21 million, which could have put an end to a firm of Clearview’s size.Īlthough it does not have clients in any of those nations, including in the U.K., its customers in the U.S. At the same time, Australia, Canada, France, Greece and Italy demanded that Clearview stop scraping data of their citizens. In 2022, the U.K.’s Information Commissioner’s Office, or ICO, said Clearview’s scraping images of British citizens was a breach of the country’s data protection laws and hit the company with the fine. In 2020, the company had no choice but to stop selling its facial recognition technology to most private firms, but police departments throughout the U.S. It currently has a database of more than 30 billion scraped images, using them for more than a million searches a month for U.S. ![]() It has been said it puts the public in a “perpetual line-up.” Such pushback is the reason why large tech companies have curtailed development of such products.Ĭlearview A.I. The company managed to keep under the radar for a couple of years, until 2019, when it was discovered that it had been scraping images from the internet without the consent of the public and the companies whose websites were used.įacial recognition technology has always faced challenges in the U.S., seeing that much of the public and certainly privacy advocates view it as a kind of Orwellian-Big Brother reality. has been in business since 2017, founded by Australian entrepreneur Hoan Ton-That and U.S. ![]() and avoided a £7.5 million ($9.1 million) fine.Ĭlearview A.I. One of the most controversial tech companies in the U.S., the facial recognition outfit Clearview A.I. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |